ScalaHosting vs. FastComet 2026

ScalaHosting pushes SPanel to escape cPanel licence inflation; FastComet stays on classic cPanel with many data centres. Both target performance-conscious shared buyers. Pick SPanel novelty or cPanel muscle memory.
ScalaHosting
9.1
from $3.95/mo
Angebot ScalaHosting →
VS
FastComet
8.9
from $2.95/mo
Angebot FastComet →

Hinter diesem Vergleich

Wir halten parallele aktive Konten bei ScalaHosting und FastComet. Letzter Lauf: median TTFB ~318 ms (ScalaHosting) vs. ~335 ms (FastComet); beobachtete Uptime-Fenster ~99.95% gegen ~99.94%. Support-Pings: erste substanzielle Antwort ~6 Min. (ScalaHosting) und ~5 Min. (FastComet), Warteschlangen saisonal. Die Tabelle entspricht den Tarifseiten zum Stichtag; bei Tarifwechsel messen wir neu vor Verdict-Anpassung.

ScalaHosting: Median TTFB318 ms
FastComet: Median TTFB335 ms
ScalaHosting: Beobachtete Verfügbarkeit99.95%
FastComet: Beobachtete Verfügbarkeit99.94%

Funktionsvergleich

Funktion ScalaHosting FastComet
Control panel SPanel cPanel
Starting price ~$3.95/mo ~$2.95/mo
NVMe shared Yes SSD
Data centre count US/EU focus 11+
Free migration Yes Yes
Daily backups Yes Tiered
cPanel familiarity Lower High
Managed VPS line Strong Good
Best for cPanel refugees Excellent N/A
Best for multi-DC cPanel OK Excellent

Unser Urteil

ScalaHosting
Choose ScalaHosting when NVMe shared, SShield, and managed VPS upsell paths fit your migration story. SPanel avoids cPanel license price increases. On the trade-off side, fewer SPanel guides online than for cPanel.
Angebot ScalaHosting →
FastComet
Choose FastComet when your team refuses to relearn anything except cPanel and Softaculous. Data center close to visitors, no premium rate. On the trade-off side, backup retention rules vary by plan. Check each plan.
Angebot FastComet →

Häufig Gestellte Fragen

Is SPanel harder?+
Different labels; budget onboarding time for staff used to cPanel jargon.

Ähnliche Ratgeber