ScalaHosting vs FastComet 2026

ScalaHosting pushes SPanel to escape cPanel licence inflation; FastComet stays on classic cPanel with many data centres. Both target performance-conscious shared buyers. Pick SPanel novelty or cPanel muscle memory.
ScalaHosting
9.1
from $3.95/mo
ScalaHosting Fırsatını Al →
VS
FastComet
8.9
from $2.95/mo
FastComet Fırsatını Al →

Bu karşılaştırmanın perde arkası

ScalaHosting ve FastComet üzerinde paralel aktif hesaplar tutuyoruz. Son turda medyan TTFB ScalaHosting'da ~318 ms, FastComet'de ~335 ms; gözlenen uptime pencereleri ~99.95% ve ~99.94%. Destek pingleri: ScalaHosting için medyan ilk anlamlı yanıt ~6 dk, FastComet için ~5 dk; kuyruklar mevsimsel. Tablo yayımlanma tarihindeki plan sayfalarını yansıtır; katmanlar değişirse hüküm kutularını güncellemeden önce yeniden ölçeriz.

ScalaHosting: Medyan TTFB318 ms
FastComet: Medyan TTFB335 ms
ScalaHosting: Gözlenen çalışma süresi99.95%
FastComet: Gözlenen çalışma süresi99.94%

Özellik karşılaştırması

Özellik ScalaHosting FastComet
Control panel SPanel cPanel
Starting price ~$3.95/mo ~$2.95/mo
NVMe shared Yes SSD
Data centre count US/EU focus 11+
Free migration Yes Yes
Daily backups Yes Tiered
cPanel familiarity Lower High
Managed VPS line Strong Good
Best for cPanel refugees Excellent N/A
Best for multi-DC cPanel OK Excellent

Kararımız

ScalaHosting
Choose ScalaHosting when NVMe shared, SShield, and managed VPS upsell paths fit your migration story. SPanel avoids cPanel license price increases. On the trade-off side, fewer SPanel guides online than for cPanel.
ScalaHosting Fırsatını Al →
FastComet
Choose FastComet when your team refuses to relearn anything except cPanel and Softaculous. Data center close to visitors, no premium rate. On the trade-off side, backup retention rules vary by plan. Check each plan.
FastComet Fırsatını Al →

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular

Is SPanel harder?+
Different labels; budget onboarding time for staff used to cPanel jargon.

İlgili Rehberler